Autocoding project proposal.

phil hunt philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Jan 26 15:43:56 CET 2002


On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 14:02:14 GMT, Timothy Rue <threeseas at earthlink.net> wrote:
>On 25-Jan-02 18:28:11 phil hunt <philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:34:23 -0500, Steve Holden <sholden at holdenweb.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>Way back in the 1980's, someone wrote a program called "The Last One",
>
>>Ah yes, I remember that. (I'm showing my age :-))
>
>>>which
>>>was intended to do all future programming for us. Nobody, we were told,
>>>would ever need to program again, as the programming would be done by "The
>>>Last One" and we would simply describe our tasks to it (isn't that
>>>programming anyway?). I seem to remember they even had the nerve to bring
>>>out "The Last One, Version 2",
>
>>Perhaps they should have called it "The Last One Really This Time Honest"...
>
>>>The criticism of your code is justified from an engineering point of view.
>
>>500 lines in one function... pass the sick bucket, please.
>
>Your the programmer genius, prove to me that the code don't work!

Certainly, I'll be happy to construct a test suite and pass/fail it for
you, if you'll pay me at my usual consulting rate.

>Show me where functions and whatever else you want to claim is the right
>way to do it, can be done in a manner that improves the processing and
>readability of the code.

Again, I will be happy to do this for you, if you'll pay me at my usual 
consulting rate.

>otherwise you are using arrogance to try and fool others into believen
>that the code don't work.

Er, I never said it didn't work, I said that i don't consider 500-line
functions to be aesthetically pleasing.

-- 
===== Philip Hunt ===== philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk =====
One OS to rule them all, one OS to find them,
One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them,
In the Land of Redmond, where the Shadows lie.





More information about the Python-list mailing list