What does Python fix?
Tim Peters
tim.one at home.com
Sat Jan 19 01:24:23 EST 2002
[Tim]
>> And Dylan's subsequent meteoric rise to world domination proved that
>> the "Lisp's problem is Lots of Insipid Stupid Parentheses" crowd was
>> right all along <wink>.
[Steven Majewski]
> But the syntax that won in Dylan was the algebraic C-like one, NOT
> the S-expr syntax.
Yup.
> How do you explain that ?
As my sig said,
>> the-reason-lisp-excels-at-getting-ignored-isn't-skin-deep-ly y'rs - tim
Syntax is skin deep. I'm not part of the "Lisp's problem is Lots of Insipid
Stupid Parentheses" crowd myself, so I never expected that Dylan's choice to
use algebraic syntax would do it good in the end; to the contrary, it
alienated old-time Lisp purists, who were Dylan's best hope for
wider-than-it-got adoption.
Any language even *inspired* by Lisp is doomed to eternal obscurity. The
Lisp'ers have been gnashing their teeth over "why?!" for decades. It's no
longer my job to explain it, since I abandoned Lisp years ago (I couldn't
understand the concept of nested parentheses <wink>).
leaving-lisp-angst-to-the-lispers-ly y'rs - tim
More information about the Python-list
mailing list