PEP 276 and future iteration PEPs

[James_Althoff at i2.com]

Greg,

Just to clarify ...
The text below listed under "James Althoff wrote:" was from Alexis Layton,
not me.

Jim

===============================

James Althoff wrote:
>
> For future iteration PEPs, I think I would be more
> comfortable with
> explicit specification
> of the index variable(s), as in
>
> for i in 0 <= i < 5

Not possible, because this conflicts with
existing syntax.

I don't like the redundancy of having the
'i' in two places, anyway.

--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, University of Canterbury,
Christchurch, New Zealand
To get my email address, please visit my web page:
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list