Which LIBC version under windows!!!!

[Michael Hudson]

David Bolen <db3l at fitlinxx.com> writes:

> Angus Mackay <amackay at radical.ca> writes:
> 
> > this is definitly a real mistake. they should never have made more that 1
> > version of a libc. I would be happy if there was only one (like any UNIX).
> 
> I haven't kept up with threads on Unix recently, but aren't there at
> least two libc's - libc and libc_r for the re-entrant thread-safe
> functions?

Depends on the unix.  It's not the case for glibc on linux, anyway.  I
think it might be the case for new FreeBSDs.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  same software, different verbosity settings (this one goes to
  eleven)                             -- the effbot on the martellibot