Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!

[Michael Gilfix]

  If it were the case that 'arbitrary code' could be truly
'lambdafied', wouldn't it be safe to say that arbitrary code could
then be pickled as well? While I know GVR designed like lambda in
themselves, even if functions definition could have a true lambda
property, that might be rather beneficial...

               -- Mike

On Fri, Jul 26 @ 15:01, Paul Rubin wrote:
> I agree that the current incarnation of lambda is deficient.  I
> think it should be strengthened so you can lambdafy arbitrary code,
> not eliminated.  The current version is better than nothing, though.

-- 
Michael Gilfix
mgilfix at eecs.tufts.edu

For my gpg public key:
http://www.eecs.tufts.edu/~mgilfix/contact.html