Making code 2.1 compatible

[Donn Cave]

Quoth Tim Peters <tim.one at comcast.net>:
...(quoting me)
|> Matter of perspective.  I would probably have picked 2.2 if it
|> had been left to me, just because it's current.  But when I've
|> proposed it in the past I've suggested the recently out-of-current
|> release, because that makes it immediately an issue.
|
| Toward what end?  They're business people, not Crusaders <wink>.

Oh, don't be so hard on them, sure they're crusaders (though not in
the sense of the European military adventures some centuries back or
the popular music group known in better days as Jazz Crusaders.)
They aren't going to be as hasty and radical, but I bet you won't be
disappointed, they're on their way.  (Now if a certain Redmond, Wa.
software company were in the host, I'd sweat it, but "business people"
here seems to be actually a pretty respectable assemblage.)

	Donn Cave, donn at u.washington.edu