Python hits the spot

Armin Steinhoff a-steinhoff at web.de
Sun Jun 23 07:56:30 EDT 2002


Siegfried Gonzi <siegfried.gonzi at kfunigraz.ac.at> wrote in message news:<3D1482AE.8FA299D8 at kfunigraz.ac.at>...
> A few weeks ago I complaint here that Python on Windows XP sucks. I had
> a problem which would took theoretically about 1.5 hours; but in reality
> it takes 6 hours on Windows XP and Python 2.2. After that 6 hours I must
> reboot my system in order to work on.
> 
> In the following I got the advice to install a real user system on my
> laptop. Okay, I bought Linux SuSE 8.0 and installed it on my laptop (256
> MB RAM, 1000 MHz Celeron). I also installed Python 2.2 (the ActivePython
> version, otherwise I couldn't install idle due to the annoying
> "free_software_garbage_2_weeks_installation_nightmare").

It seems you have not a way with that "free_software_garbage"

> SWIG helped me to make my external Python C function (with gcc); and
> F2PY helped me to create my external Python Fortran 90 function (with
> the Intel Fortran 95 compiler).
> 
> The directories and all the other programs and data are the same as on
> Windows.
> 
> 
> 1. After starting the process from within idle the complete system
> freezes after the first wavelength (after about 20 minutes). I couldn't
> kill a process or open a different session (via F2) in order to kill
> python. The last resort: turn off the power supply.

Seems so that _YOUR_ Python version shuts down the whole machine ... 
It's simple -> BS in means BS out :) 

 
> 2. I thought it is better to start the process from the command line and
> in a X terminal: python forcing.py
> The same behavior as aforementioned: last resort: power supply.

Your (extended) Python version seems to be really CRAPPY !!

> That is
> really good and fine because a Linux system really is greedy for "shut
> down immediately".
> 
> 3. I thought it has to do with Gnome and I logged in to a KDE session.
> Same behavior as in point 1. and 2.

Why the heck should your problem related to Gnome or KDE ??
_YOU_ have implemented a problem into Python ...

(geborener Weltmeister ??)
 
> My conclusion: I will rewrite my simulation in Fortran 90 and will
> abadon Python.

Your problem has nothing to do with Python  ... your implementation is the problem.

>Python is maybe good for some small scripts but not
> appropiate for serious programming.

Just bizarr!! Are you able to do serious program development??

Have a look to the SQL database 'gadfly' ... and then tell me again 
that Python isn't appropriate for serious programming 
 
> Thank you Billy Boy for a forgiving user system Windows XP

 ... and its crazy users :)

Armin


which in turn
> relieves Python's "wreak havoc" behavior.
> 
> I cannot believe that Linux is responsible for Python's ill behavior
> under Linux. Before you start ranting about note the following: In a
> first step it has nothing to do with my programming style (admittedly
> not very good and famous) it has to do that the same calculation cannot
> be performed on Linux and Python 2.2!
> 
> 
> S. Gonzi



More information about the Python-list mailing list