spamtrash at softhome.net
Tue Jun 18 10:53:01 CEST 2002
jimrowe at optilink.com (James Rowe) wrote in message news:<a9bcagho74.22t.jimrowe at optilink.com>...
> So I suppose the question is: Why is __subclasses__ not documented
> or listed? Can we safely use __subclasses__ and not worry about
> it "going away" in the future?
Last time I checked most of the work done in unifying types and
classes wasn't documented yet. I'm not sure __subclasses__ and the
unification are related, but I guess so.
The only info I've found was a thread by Bruce Eckel. He also
mentions it in the draft of his book Thinking in Python.
More information about the Python-list