TuxTrax at fortress.tuxnet.net
Wed Jun 5 23:23:13 CEST 2002
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:44:43 -0400, Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> wrote:
> TuxTrax wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I am new to this forum, and to Python, please excuse the newbie question.
>> I have started reading the o'reilly book, "learning python" and find python
>> to be an amazing language so far. My first impression of it is a language that
>> is easier than basic to learn and use, and more powerful than many other
>> high level languages such as pascal.
>> My question is this; I realize that Python compiles to bytecode automatically
>> as part of the interpreters tokenization run, but is there a way to permanently
>> compile python code outputting to an executable binary?
> Why do you want to do that? For presumably increased speed, or because
> you don't want the hassle of multiple .py files all over the place (in
> other words, better packaging)?
I was more interested in if there were existing tools to do it, already
I really don't care to "hide" my source code, as I hail from the open source
Linux community (kind of like "I'm from star fleet, I never lie" <g>)
and I would be releasing any source for any python app that I wrote (that was
any good <g>) anyway. Besides, if you know others will be seeing your source
you tend to write cleaner code <g>.
As I noted, it was a newbie question, a matter of curiousity. I am just
starting to learn python and I really love it, and I am full of such
questions that probably others have already gotten past.
Packaging is a thought, but speed (so far) isn't an issue, as python is pretty
TuxTrax (n.) An invincible, all terrain, Linux driven armored assault
vehicle that can take as much fire as it gives ;-)
<Carnivore activation string>
ASSASINATION ANTHRAX PRESIDENT NUCLEAR TALIBAN AMMONIUM NITRATE
</Carnivore activation string>
Yes, I am a Penguin cult high priest. Fin readings upon request.
ROT13 this email address to mail me: uvtuqrfregzna at lnubb.pbz
More information about the Python-list