should i learn it first ?
philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk
Mon Mar 11 01:54:22 CET 2002
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 20:01:02 GMT, Grant Edwards <grante at visi.com> wrote:
>In article <slrna8mogf.6ek.philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk>, phil hunt wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 22:57:42 -0500, Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> wrote:
>>>I agree with much of what you say, especially the "consider skipping
>>>C++ and just learn C part", but _what_ pragmatic point of view is it
>>>that has one learning Perl, Java, or C++ when one uses Python already?
>>>Not dissing those languages, but when would you really need them?
>> I can think of several tasks for which C++ is better than Python,
>> e.g. writing operating systems, network stacks, windowing systems,
>> run-time interpreters, crypto algorithms, etc.
>And I can think of several languages which are better than C++
>for those tasks: Modula-2, Modula-3, Ada, Bliss-32...
Not if you take into account factors such as availability of
compilers, libraries, reference works, programmers etc.
Sometimes, the popularity of a language is itself a factor
determining how good it is. For certain values of "good", of course.
<"><"><"> Philip Hunt <philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk> <"><"><">
"I would guess that he really believes whatever is politically
advantageous for him to believe."
-- Alison Brooks, referring to Michael
Portillo, on soc.history.what-if
More information about the Python-list