Emile van Sebille wrote: > If, in the beginning, Guido opted to call 'in' 'of', would there be a > question of iterating over an integer? > > For example, > > for each of range(6): > for each of mylist: > for each of 6: I would expect 'for each of 6' to produce just 6, so my answer would be 'No'. Hamish Lawson