PEP 218 Re: ANN: set-0.1 module available

[Roman Suzi]

On Tue, 21 May 2002, Roman Suzi wrote:

> 
> Maybe we try to use quantitative arguments? Are there any suggestions for
> small benchmarks: we can use set-0.2 to see real efficiency (or lack of),
> etc.
> 
> Any nice/classic set-using problems around?

My input:
-----------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/bin/env python2.2

from set import set

"""Making graph from adjency matrix"""

adjency = [
  [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1],
  [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1],
  [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1],
  [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0],
  [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1],
  [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1],
  [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0],
]

V = set(range(len(adjency)))
E = set([(i, j) for i in V for j in V if adjency[i][j]])
G = (V, E)

print G
---------------------------------------------------------



Sincerely yours, Roman A.Suzi
-- 
 - Petrozavodsk - Karelia - Russia - mailto:rnd at onego.ru -