Python documentation in DocBook

[DaveP]

Gerhard Häring <gerhard.haering at opus-gmbh.net> wrote in

> Of course I agree that the standard Docbook DTD wouldn't be sufficient
> and would need to be extended.
> 

Could you be more specific on this please?
Docbook's purpose is to document  software, so if you've
found a shortfall, I'm sure the docbook group would be interested in
filling any such gaps?
  What sort of extensions?

regards DaveP.