old SimpleXMLRPCLib classes

[Brian Quinlan]

Jacob wrote:

> It isn't missing, actually; your eyeballs must have veered off course
> for a moment.

OK, found it. Thanks.

> Method signatures don't have to include type information.  The number
> and name of arguments is a signature, too.

So the code doesn't follow the signature proposal described at:
http://www.ampoliros.com/en/dev/sdk/xmlrpc/sysmethodsig.html

So, for example:

def add(x, y): return x + y

system.methodSignature('add') =>

[[int, int, int], 
 [string, string, string], 
 [array, array, array], 
 [double, double, double]]

Cheers,
Brian