My (late) beef with Simple Generator syntax (PEP 255)
Niki Spahiev
spahievi at vega.bg
Thu Nov 14 15:47:37 EST 2002
11/13/2002, 22:37:28, Cameron Horn wrote:
CH> Assuming that having an empty generator is as valid as empty functions and classes, what kind of linguistic cruft is that? I expect better out of python, dang it.
CH> What I'd like to write is:
CH> gen foo():
CH> return
def foo():
if 0: yield None
optimized to empty generator by compiler
--
Best regards,
Niki Spahiev
More information about the Python-list
mailing list