newbie question on threading
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Sun Oct 13 02:32:32 EDT 2002
In article <jsngquskdhc0cpg867djcna0cl6u8tlm9l at 4ax.com>,
Gonçalo Rodrigues <op73418 at mail.telepac.pt> wrote:
>
>#Balancing act: We can't afford a pure busy loop, so we
>#have to sleep; but if we sleep the whole timeout time,
>#we'll be unresponsive.
>
>My question is: why is a busy loop not affordable (without a sleep
>call), e.g. something like (in pseudo-code description)
>
>while 1:
> <acquire lock>
> if <acquire sucessfull>:
> break
> if <timedout?>:
> break
> <calculate endtime>
Consider this:
while 1:
pass
Given the above loop in a thread, how much useful work is the thread
doing? Not much, right? Well, adding an "if" statement to the loop
doesn't do any good for producing useful work.
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
Project Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list