Terje Johan Abrahamsen
spoermeg at voldelig.com
Tue Sep 17 19:38:40 EDT 2002
"Tim Peters" <tim.one at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mailman.1032152959.16896.python-list at python.org...
> [Terje Johan Abrahamsen]
> > If I would like to write some code that would not be possible for
> > others to read, after I distribute the program, would Python be
> > suitable?
> No, but I don't know of a language that would be. Unless you're also
> to supply a restricted CPU that prevents stepping through the machine
> you can't really hide anything from a determined reverse-engineerer of
> ordinary skill.
> > ...
> > or should I look for a compiled language instead?
> It's very easy to reverse-compile Python bytecode. It's not so easy to
> disassemble compiled machine code, but if you think there aren't lots
> who can read machine language almost as easily as high-level source,
> in for a surprise. Compilers follow predictable patterns too. You could
> try writing directly in highly obfuscated assembler; that would raise the
> bar high enough to discourage almost everyone, although it would also
> attract a class of cracker who would feel challenged to outwit you.
> If you didn't know all that already, you're playing a game you can't win.
> better idea is to question why you want to play it at all <wink>.
I am not looking to stop people that really want to copy my code. My program
is not that unique. However, I want them to have to type the code themselves
if they want to duplicate it. Not only to reuse my sourcecode if it can be
picked up from Py2Exe.
More information about the Python-list