Stackless Python, eventual merge?

David Abrahams david.abrahams at
Sun Sep 15 13:22:31 EDT 2002

"Christian Tismer" <tismer at> wrote in message
news:mailman.1032107006.6411.python-list at

> The changes to Python are also so small now, that
> it doesn't matter if it will be merged or not.
> Porting Stackless to a new Python is a matter of a few
> hours. You may rely on getting a Stackless version
> of any new Python version in almost no time.

I think it still matters. You don't want people who need stackless'
capabilities to have to use a non-standard Python forever, do you?

           David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave at *

More information about the Python-list mailing list