Stackless Python, eventual merge?

[Ian Bicking]

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 01:03, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> writes:
> 
> > But it doesn't seem like complexity was ever the fundamental problem --
> > the complexity could have been dealt with, but I don't believe there was
> > ever any indication that if it was simplified or documented that it
> > would get into standard Python.  
> 
> That is not true. I have indicated this atleast once, namely when I
> studied the code. For me, the complicatedness was always the problem -
> complexity is fine, since this is a complex problem.

Was there some indication that Stackless would be integrated if the code
was cleaned up, documented, or otherwise simplified?  I don't believe
there was, but I may be wrong.  

Without such an indication, there is no reason to think that mere
technical changes to Stackless will lead to it being included in
standard Python.

  Ian