Python for VB6 programmers (was Re: Complexity of standard Python data structures)
Andy Jewell
andy at wild-flower.co.uk
Thu Apr 17 18:10:15 EDT 2003
On Thursday 17 Apr 2003 5:27 am, Parzival Herzog wrote:
> "Aahz" <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote in message
> news:b7kqr8$jsq$1 at panix2.panix.com...
>
> > In article <Wrena.33096$T34.876856 at news2.tin.it>,
> >
> > Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote:
> > >Steve Holden wrote:
> > >> You'd do better to call it "Python for VB programmers", expecially
> > >> since the change to VB6 is so radical that migrating to a new and more
> > >> sensible language might be an attractive option to some!
>
> Maybe when you're done that, you could do "Python for RPG/400"
>
> H*
> H* RPG/400 VERSION OF THE BOTTLES PROGRAM *
> H*
> FSCREEN O F 80 WORKSTN
> C MOVE 100 X 30
> C X DOWGE0
> C EXCPT
> C SUB 1 X
> C END
> C SETON LR
> OSCREEN E
> O X 3
> O 26 'BOTTLES OF BEER ON THE'
> O 31 'WALL,'
> O X 36
> O 53 'BOTTLES OF BEER'
> O E
> O 22 'TAKE ONE DOWN AND PASS'
> O 32 'IT AROUND'
>
> P.S. Can you believe it, at version 400 kicks at the can, they came up with
> this?
>
> Parzival
Hmmm...
When I look at Python compared to RPG now (after a little AS/400 training - my
RPG course is the week after next) I begin to see that RPG is not as ugly as
I at first thought. It's worse than that - it's practically assembler code,
but without the mnemonics! :-P . What HAVE I let myself in for?
I'll take this to my course and throw it round a bit to see the reaction...
It's a pity I can't recode our legacy apps at work in Python/400 - I have
toyed with it, but it's impractical to rewrite nearly 15 years of coding
strata, with its roots in System 36 RPG, in Python...
It's a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it.
regards,
-andyj
More information about the Python-list
mailing list