A better unittest
staschuk at telusplanet.net
Wed Apr 16 20:13:44 CEST 2003
Quoth Thomas Heller:
[...changing output of unittest...]
> The big advantage is that if I execute the tests from within XEmacs with
> C-c C-c, the output ocurrs in a *Python Output* buffer, and the cursor
> in the source buffer jumps to the real cause of the error: the
> self.failxxx() call.
> What do people think? Is this a useful change, and should I submit a
+0, since I don't use XEmacs and the change would have negligible
effect for me.
(Making XEmacs let you navigate the traceback would imho be a
Steven Taschuk "The world will end if you get this wrong."
staschuk at telusplanet.net -- "Typesetting Mathematics -- User's Guide",
Brian Kernighan and Lorrinda Cherry
More information about the Python-list