Teaching : Python, Scheme, Java...
Bengt Richter
bokr at oz.net
Thu Apr 17 19:45:41 EDT 2003
On 17 Apr 2003 14:54:36 -0500, Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 02:55, Jean-Paul Roy wrote:
>> - Python is bad : tail recursion is not iterative (also astonished at
>> that, I can understand with an interpreter, but compiler ?)
>
>Some would argue that tail recursion is not good for teaching and
>understanding, because you loose the call stack. In the likely event of
>a traceback, it can be very confusing if you don't fully indicate how
>you got there, or if points upon the path were lost in an optimization.
>
Or if the stack trace is so deep the first part scrolls away and you
give up waiting for the last part ;-)
Perphaps a trace output that would transform the traceback of, e.g.,
>>> def recu(n):
... if n>0: recu(n-1)
... raise Exception, 'test'
...
>>> recu(5)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
File "<stdin>", line 3, in recu
Exception: test
to
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "<stdin>", line 2, in recu
[ ... above 1 line repeated 4 more times ...]
File "<stdin>", line 3, in recu
Exception: test
or the like, could be handy?
And IWT short repeating cycles could be handled too.
Regards,
Bengt Richter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list