Bug? If not, how to work around it?

Gonçalo Rodrigues op73418 at mail.telepac.pt
Wed Aug 6 19:54:03 EDT 2003


On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 19:46:39 -0400, "Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu>
wrote:

>
>"Gonçalo Rodrigues" <op73418 at mail.telepac.pt> wrote in message
>news:upv2jv4eeusj7bli30j7a7ikd0cq3njvm4 at 4ax.com...
>> >I changed the __iter__ method to the following, and it seems to do
>what
>> >you want:
>> >
>> >    def __iter__(self):
>> >        return iter(self.__obj)
>
>> But this is precisely what I don't want to do.
>
>If you don't want to do what works,
>why ask us to bother answering?
>

Because it may not work. That is, the use case I have in mind serves
as proxy for an object that may or may not have __iter__. IOW if I
stick __iter__ I have to code a second class, etc... etc... Oh well...

>TJR
>

With my best regards,
G. Rodrigues




More information about the Python-list mailing list