What's better about Ruby than Python?
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sat Aug 23 23:17:30 CEST 2003
"Neil Hodgson" <nhodgson at bigpond.net.au> writes:
> David Abrahams:
>> BTW, the C++ preprocessor is a fairly weak macro system. A higher
>> level metaprogramming facility that knows more about the underlying
>> language could be a lot cleaner, clearer, safer, and more expressive.
> What do you think of OpenC++?
I think it's an interesting idea that hasn't been developed much in a
long time. The Synopsis (http://synopsis.sf.net) guys have been
maintaining their own fork just so they could process Boost code
correctly - I like and use Synopsis Personally, I think GCC_XML has
more promise than OC++ because the correctness and performance of its
front-end is tied to a real compiler which sees a *lot* of use.
More information about the Python-list