cPickle alternative?

Michael Peuser mpeuser at web.de
Fri Aug 15 17:23:49 CEST 2003


Hi,

I have no idea! I used a similar scheme the other day and made some
benchmarks (I *like* benchmarks!)

About 6 MB took 4 seconds dumping as well as loading on a 800 Mhz P3 Laptop.
When using binary mode it went down to about 1.5 seconds (And space to 2 MB)

THis is o.k., because I generally have problems beeing faster than 1 MB/sec
with my  2" drive, processor and Python ;-)

Python 2.3 seems to have even a more effective "protocoll mode 2".

May be your structures are *very* complex??

Kindly
Michael P



"Drochom" <pedrosch at gazeta.pl> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bhiqlg$9qj$1 at atlantis.news.tpi.pl...
> Hello,
>     I have a huge problem with loading very simple structure into memory
>     it is a list of tuples, it has 6MB and consists of 100000 elements
>
> >import cPickle
>
> >plik = open("mealy","r")
> >mealy = cPickle.load(plik)
> >plik.close()
>
>     this takes about 30 seconds!
>     How can I accelerate it?
>
> Thanks in adv.
>
>
>






More information about the Python-list mailing list