[Python-Dev] rexec.py unuseable
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Tue Dec 16 05:45:50 EST 2003
"John Roth" <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> writes:
> I've also seen comments that none of the developers
> was interested in fixing it,
I think this is a little unfair. I think some of the developers are
/interested/ in a fix, just noone has the time to provide one. Maybe
that's all you meant.
Of course, the nasty thing about security issues is that a 90%
solution isn't a whole lot of use.
> For myself, I'd prefer to see a facility where
> the system would build an object structure
> consisting *only* of standard objects,
> including dicts, lists, tuples, strings, ints
> and floats, and would reject anything else.
> That is to say, no built-ins, no operators,
> no object methods, no classes other than
> the general use fundamental objects.
> That's use case 2 above.
How about
http://www.livejournal.com/users/moshez/4120.html
or similar?
Cheers,
mwh
--
ARTHUR: Ford, you're turning into a penguin, stop it.
-- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 2
More information about the Python-list
mailing list