UserLinux chooses Python as "interpretive language" of choice
newsgroups at jhrothjr.com
Sat Dec 20 22:26:13 CET 2003
"Steve Lamb" <grey at despair.dmiyu.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbu9f7q.qbj.grey at dmiyu.org...
> On 2003-12-20, John Roth <newsgroups at jhrothjr.com> wrote:
> > It doesn't matter. As you can see by my reply to Bengt,
> > the crux of the issue is that, in Ruby, the function call
> > syntax is *optional.* There is no way to make it optional
> > in Python, and it is not clear whether it should be.
> It is quite clear. I, and others, have shown why several times.
It's clear that it should be? No, that's clearly not what
Remainder of rant snipped.
> Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
> PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of
As I said before, you are not and will never be.
More information about the Python-list