2.3 list reverse() bug?

[Andrew MacIntyre]

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Alex Martelli wrote:

> list(x) is my favourite way to make a shallow copy of list x, but x[:]
> and copy.copy(x) are essentially equivalent.

Behaviourally yes, performance wise no.

--
Andrew I MacIntyre                     "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andymac at bullseye.apana.org.au  (pref) | Snail: PO Box 370
        andymac at pcug.org.au             (alt) |        Belconnen  ACT  2616
Web:    http://www.andymac.org/               |        Australia