ternary operator vote

Roy Smith roy at panix.com
Sun Feb 9 17:23:46 EST 2003


In article <3E46CAEF.DA95B643 at alcyone.com>,
 Erik Max Francis <max at alcyone.com> wrote:

> holger krekel wrote:
> 
> > The Votes
> > are
> > to be published so plenty of people can check.  I am pretty sure
> > that he can post a neutral "Call for Votes" and most of the people
> > here have an oppinion regardless of the exact question anyway.
> 
> Well, I think that's the issue.  We want to decide on a process we all
> accept (mind you, I don't think it will be hard).  Full accountability
> in the form of making public everyone's votes is the best way to get
> that, and then those results should be passed off to Guido.  In our
> recent exchanges Aahz seemed to think the latter was okay; I don't know
> if he had planned to make the results public or not (I think he
> absolutely should).

My understanding of the process is that we express an opinion and Guido 
decides what he wants to do.  The details of what process we use to 
express our opinion seem somewhat trivial.




More information about the Python-list mailing list