PEP-308 a "simplicity-first" alternative

Erik Max Francis max at
Thu Feb 13 00:15:55 CET 2003

Terry Reedy wrote:

> Yes and no.  You can, in effect, vote it down by voting for a
> replacement that current users of the idiom will switch to.

In effect, but that doesn't justify _any_ conditional operator notation
simply because it is not as ugly as the and/or trick or does not suffer
from its defects.

 Erik Max Francis / max at /
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ You cannot step into the same river once.
\__/ Cratylus
    Python chess module /
 A chess game adjudicator in Python.

More information about the Python-list mailing list