Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?
donn at drizzle.com
Fri Feb 7 05:48:11 CET 2003
Quoth "Donn Cave" <donn at drizzle.com>:
[... about Haskell type classes etc. ]
| The Caml version could probably be designed to do the same thing,
| but not as transparently so to speak. I guess essentially you'd
| be re-inventing the typeclass, as a record of functions that
| implement the abstract interface for each (user) data type.
And of course OCaml does support similar functionality through its
Donn Cave, donn at drizzle.com
More information about the Python-list