Why does Dynamic Typing really matter?!?

Donn Cave donn at drizzle.com
Fri Feb 7 05:48:11 CET 2003

Quoth "Donn Cave" <donn at drizzle.com>:
[... about Haskell type classes etc. ]
| The Caml version could probably be designed to do the same thing,
| but not as transparently so to speak.  I guess essentially you'd
| be re-inventing the typeclass, as a record of functions that
| implement the abstract interface for each (user) data type.

And of course OCaml does support similar functionality through its
module system.

	Donn Cave, donn at drizzle.com

More information about the Python-list mailing list