PEP 308 - ternary operator

[Erik Max Francis]

Wolfgang Strobl wrote:

> Counter question: do you really believe that it needs a sequence of 36
> ternaries do get an incomprehensible expression? I don't think so.

Of course not.  So the IOCCC entry really had nothing to do with
anything, right?

_Any_ language construct in _any_ language can be abused.  That you've
found a particularly abusive example doesn't really tell us much.

-- 
 Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ If a thing is worth doing, then it is worth doing badly.
\__/ G.K. Chesterton
    Church / http://www.alcyone.com/pyos/church/
 A lambda calculus explorer in Python.