PEP308: Yet another syntax proposal

[Erik Max Francis]

Alexander Schmolck wrote:

> Even with an order of magnitude uncertainty (and I'd think one could
> do
> better), the frequency doesn't look to impressive, does it?

Did you even read what I've said?  The frequency by itself means
_nothing_.  How often are generators used? list comprehensions?
metaclasses?

No one ever said that conditional operators (in any language) were so
ubiquitous that Python _had_ to have them.  Frequency arguments defeat
strawmen.

> Even without bothering to come up with some formal and quantifiable
> criterion
> of expressiveness, couldn't we just reach the consensus that something
> that
> can be trivially and compactly rewritten with existing language
> constructs
> isn't all that expressive?

Right, with idioms that are short, unreadable, and wrong.

-- 
 Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ Being in love for real / It ain't like a movie screen
\__/ India Arie
    Bosskey.net: Aliens vs. Predator 2 / http://www.bosskey.net/avp2/
 A personal guide to Aliens vs. Predator 2.