Another conditional expression candidate (PEP 308)
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Tue Feb 11 10:35:30 CET 2003
"Anders J. Munch" wrote:
> The BDFL shot down the straight, parentheses not required version, in
> the pep. Looks too much like a statement. Perhaps requiring
> the parentheses that I would have used anyway will mend that.
Does it? The example shows the syntax with parentheses, but doesn't
really make a specific point about that. He's no fool, so I guess that
does suggest the parentheses will be required, but it's not entirely
clear. (Correct me if I'm wrong; I see no mention of the parentheses
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ I always entertain great hopes.
\__/ Robert Frost
REALpolitik / http://www.realpolitik.com/
Get your own customized newsfeed online in realtime ... for free!
More information about the Python-list