Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
Brandon Van Every
vanevery at 3DProgrammer.com
Sat Feb 1 00:21:14 CET 2003
Andy Freeman wrote:
> "Brandon Van Every" <vanevery at 3DProgrammer.com> wrote in message
> news:<a2h_9.5383$Wu1.411649 at newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>> My contention is, if your approach is incremental and architectural,
>> does not offer any amazing payoff over C++. Python only gives you a
>> value add when you're trying to be more spontaneous.
> The point has been clear for some time. The problem is that the
> evidence seems to be "I think". Meanwhile, the folks saying that the
> point is wrong have actual relevant experience.
I don't have the Python experience. I do have the C++ experience. You
guys' talk of the horror and gloom and doom of C++ sounds like another
planet to me. So clearly I'm having some kind of experience in C++ that you
are not having. What it sounds like, is you guys blow your legs off with
all the fancy C++ stuff, because you're in group environments where people
don't know how to Keep It Simple Stupid.
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA
20% of the world is real.
80% is gobbledygook we make up inside our own heads.
More information about the Python-list