Python vs. C++ Builder - speed of development
anamax at earthlink.net
Sun Feb 2 19:41:58 CET 2003
"Brandon Van Every" <vanevery at 3DProgrammer.com> wrote in message news:<vP3%9.3162$6P2.354639 at newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
> Andy Freeman wrote:
> > Actually, "as simple as is appropriate" is better than "as simple as
> > possible". C/C++ favors the latter and punishes the former.
> I disagree. On the industrial scale, I say "as simple as possible."
I've found that I can almost always make something simpler. I've also
found that doing so beyond a certain point is always bad. I call that
point "appropriate". It's usually not close to "possible".
BTW - I've written large programs in several languages and in several
different problem domains, albeit not as many as Martelli. And you?
More information about the Python-list