problem with Python ASP? (builtin ASP object has been referenced which is no longer valid.)

[Mark Hammond]

I am pretty sure this has now been fixed.  149 had a slightly flakey 
version of ASP :(  You should be able to take the 
win32comext\axscript\*.py tree from the latest and move it into 149.

Mark.

Preston Landers wrote:
> I'm having a bit of trouble with my Python ASP pages and I'm wondering
> if this is a known problem or is fixed in later versions.  I'm
> currently using b149 of the win32all extensions, compiled by myself. 
> I currently need to use Python 2.1, so a different version of the
> extensions is not really possible for me, and if this is already
> fixed, I need to try to port the fixes into the b149 tree. I don't see
> anything in the b151 changes that would indicate this problem is fixed
> anyway.
> 
> The problem seems to be reproducable with a very simple test.asp page:
> 
> <%@ Language="Python" %>
> 
> <%
> #Resp = ax.Response
> Resp = Response
> 
> Resp.Write("Hello, World.<P>")
> %>
> 
> The first time any individual user accesses the page on my site, they
> get an ASP 500.100 internal server error:
> 
> Error Type:
> Python ActiveX Scripting Engine, ASP 0211 (0x80020009)
> A built-in ASP object has been referenced, which is no longer valid.
> /testpy/test.asp, line 6
> 
> However, reload the page and everything works a dandy. Until someone
> else comes along and accesses the page.  They then get the same 500
> error, and then they can reload and everything is ok.  Basically it
> seems like every time the "current user" changes, the get this 500
> server error, and then everything works fine on reload until another
> user comes along.  Very annoying, and it is currently preventing me
> from deploying my Python/ASP solution.
> 
> It doesn't matter if you use Response or ax.Response -- the first
> access for each new user seems to cause this "built-in ASP object has
> been referenced, which is no longer valid" line.  I am NOT using a
> Global.asa on the site.
> 
> has anyone seen this before?  Perhaps I am just missing something
> obvious about the ASP model?
> 
> thanks
> Preston Landers