PEP 308 vote type (was Re: Update to PEP308: if-then-else expression)

[Laura Creighton]

> 
> "Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)" <tdelaney at avaya.com> wrote in message
> 
> +0 on having a ternary at all (was -0, but found an option I liked);
> 
> That is not exactly an option.  The currently-used ternary,
> conditional on the first option being non-null, is "test and opt1 or
> opt 2".  To me, 100 uses in the standard library makes it
> quasi-officially 'blessed'.  In any case, it is a straightforward
> application of Python's syntax rules.  This is the status quo that a
> no vote is voting for.
> 
> Terry J. Reedy
> 

No, the 'I would have made them rewrite it' faction gets to vote as
well.  That's the 'handing out spraypaint to improve the quality
of vandalism' argument.

Laura