PEP 308: Alternative conditional operator forms

[Andrew Koenig]

David> If it turns out that the interpreter can nicely support

David> lval = if C: x else: y

David> then I'd be perfectly happy with it.  My support for an
David> alternate keyword is based on the assumption that the above
David> syntax can't work.

Please see my proposed grammar changes elsewhere in this discussion.
-- 
Andrew Koenig, ark at research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark