For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression
Christian Tismer
tismer at tismer.com
Sun Feb 9 19:30:08 EST 2003
Christian Tismer wrote:
Despite some ridiculous attempts to sound funny,
this is not funny. I'm going to open a serious
flame war, a flame war that has no
There is the LC construct. I never was pro, and
will probably never be.
But now there is this incredible cond-expr thing.
It has its own existence in its own respect.
/but/: If it tries to lean on further syntax which
is living on a small surface, since
LC had some postfix if/for existance already, since
I didn't keep my eyes open:
If that reasoning is *now* used to convince myriads
of newcomers that the new syntax s pythonic syntax!!!
Then I will put any and all of my power into dissing
LC's as well!!!
I do not want LC's to introduce a new direction of
obfuscated Python.
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list
mailing list