OT: Ultimate Language Syntax Cleanness Comparison
Jim Richardson
warlock at eskimo.com
Sat Feb 8 07:06:04 EST 2003
On 7 Feb 2003 19:55:35 -0800,
Jeremy Fincher <tweedgeezer at hotmail.com> wrote:
> holger krekel <pyth at devel.trillke.net> wrote in message news:<mailman.1044658940.11235.python-list at python.org>...
>> I was actually quite surprised to find out (together with a perl-friend)
>> that there is no easy way to parse perl. All the methods involve
>> evaluating/executing it at the same time. Cool, isn't it.
>
> That's not true. Perl *is* compiled to a bytecode format (what do you
> think all the jazz about Parrot is for?) There's no easy way to lex
> Perl separate from parsing it. Lexing and parsing Perl code is one in
> the same. Evaluating it is entirely separate.
>
> Jeremy
*raises hand in ignorance*
Can someone explain the differences between them? that is, evaluating,
parsing and lexing? they seem pretty synonymic (ick!) to me, so I am
missing something. What?
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
A bad day, is when aliens attack, the dog bites you, and your boss tells
you that the new client wants to make a few changes before delivery.
Linux, super computers, office computers, or home computers, it works.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list