For review: PEP 308 - If-then-else expression

[Carlos Ribeiro]

Andrew,

I'll pick just one example...

On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:49 am, Andrew Dalke wrote:
> However, modifying the code is much easier.
>
>   descr  = b** 2 - 4*a*c
>   if descr > 0:
>     root_type = "real"
>   elsif descr == 0:
>     root_type = "duplicate"
>   else:
>    root_type = "imaginary"
>   print "descriminate =", descr
>   print "roots are", root_type

I don't think that the code above is much clearer than the one-liner with the 
ternary operator. What I see is that you may be used to sequential 
programming, and so, specifying every step seems to be the "right way of 
doing it" for you. In my opinion, the only thing that the code above buys you 
is the ability to follow it step by step, but that does not mean it's much 
clearer - only that it works a few abstraction layers below the one-liner 
with the ternary operator. 

In my opinion, the best thing to do right now is to wait a few days for things 
to settle down. I'm sure that many people that reacted against it today will 
get used to the idea fairly quickly, specially if we come up with a slightly 
better idiom (this one is quite good, but some good candidates for 
improvement have appeared today, and more will come).

There is always reaction to change. Sometimes we get used to the new stuff so 
fast that we can't even understand why did we react first place.


Carlos Ribeiro
cribeiro at mail.inet.com.br