no side effects
ark at research.att.com
Wed Jan 8 16:37:25 CET 2003
Michele> I was surprised by the following code:
Michele> for i in [1,2,3]:
Michele> ... print i,
Michele> ... i=3
Michele> I would have expected only 1 to be printed, but instead Python
Michele> continues the loop without noticing that the value of i has
Michele> changed. IOW, no side effect.
Michele> I am not against that (I am even in favor), but it fooled my
Michele> intuition coming from other languages.
What would your intuition have said if you had written this instead?
for i in [3, 1, 4]:
Andrew Koenig, ark at research.att.com, http://www.research.att.com/info/ark
More information about the Python-list