[ann] Minimal Python project
tismer at tismer.com
Sun Jan 12 20:03:23 CET 2003
Steve Holden wrote:
> "Edward K. Ream" <edream at tds.net> wrote ...
>>>As Armin Rigo of PSYCO fame takes part in the effort,
>>we are confident that MinimalPython will eventually
>>run faster than today's CPython.
>>This announcement seems to be making a truly remarkable claim, namely that
>>one could increase the speed of C code by recoding it in Python and then
>>applying Psycho to it.
>>I am inclined to disbelieve this claim. Why should Psycho be able to do
>>better than an optimizing C compiler applied to hand-written interpreter
>>code and/or library code? [...]
> In more or less the same way that a good C compiler nowadays tends to
> produce code that out-performs an algorithm coded in assembly language by a
> moderately-competent programmer?
A good C compiler outperforms a good assembly
programmer, since it is stubborn enough and able
to keep track of many registers and variables.
These are things that a programmer can probably
do better in the small, but not in the large.
But a C compiler creates static code.
A compiler which is able to figure out
the common cases at run-time and is able
to specialize, is more adaptive and thereby
can theoretically produce better code than
the static compiler. It also can adapt to
the actual CPU version much better, if we
This is of course not an easy job, and maybe
we will fail miserably for some reason.
But we will never know if we don't try.
There is at least a chance to take -- chris
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list