[ann] Minimal Python project
tismer at tismer.com
Sun Jan 12 18:31:44 CET 2003
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.de> writes:
>>I am very convinced that this project is able to lead to a Python
>>implementation that has a smaller code base with a minimum of C
>>code, and that runs faster than CPython. And it will be Stackless
>>by nature. I don't claim that this will be the result of a single
>>sprint. But this is my goal.
> I don't doubt that it's possible. That's not meant as any kind of
> slight on the CPython implementers, but it's there are always great
> benefits to doing something a second time around.
Thanks, this is very encouraging.
Yes, the current C implementation is probably
near the best compromise between readability,
maintainability and efficiency that can be
achieved with a static system.
To make substantial improvements possible, the
word "static" must go away.
> In my dreams we'd have a completely self-hosted Python implementation
> that compiles to native code on the fly, sort of like the Yale T system.
Never heard of this, but this is my dream, too.
ciao - chris
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list