iterating in reverse

[Erik Max Francis]

"Jonathan P." wrote:

> Is there an elegant and
> efficient way to iterate through x in
> reverse without having to create a reversed
> copy of it (i.e. y=x[:]; y.reverse())?

It's not too elegant, but

	for j in range(len(x) - 1, -1, -1):
	    i = x[j]
	    print i

-- 
 Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ All the people in his neighborhood turn around and get mad and sing
\__/ Public Enemy
    Bosskey.net: Return to Wolfenstein / http://www.bosskey.net/rtcw/
 A personal guide to Return to Castle Wolfenstein.