embedding python, missing symbols

[Jack Diederich]

On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:10:54PM +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Jack Diederich <jack at performancedrivers.com> writes:
> 
> > > > gcc -I<path to Python.h> ./libpython2.2.a example.c
> > > gcc -o example.o -I<path to Python.h> example.c
> > > gcc example.o -o example -L<path to Python-libs> -lpython2.2
> > The -L<path> -l<name> combination gets translated to the plainer
> > full-path of the actual .a lib.  It's a lot more flexible for distributing
> > makefiles, but equivalent to the above.
> 
> No, it's not. You are passing libpython2.2.a first; this is
> incorrect. In the second invocation, -lpython2.2 is passed last.

Ahh, I didn't know order was ever important.  For Makefiles libs go at the
end out of habit, typing it by hand introduced the error.

Thank you, it now works as expected.

-jackdied