Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
bokr at oz.net
Thu Jan 9 01:05:11 CET 2003
On 08 Jan 2003 10:11:03 -0800, Paul Rubin <phr-n2002b at NOSPAMnightsong.com> wrote:
>bokr at oz.net (Bengt Richter) writes:
>> BTW, how about the option to insert \n after every line_len characters?
>> And if so, should there be a final \n guaranteed there or not there?
>> Or should that be left to the outside too?
>I'd say leave that on the outside too.
Stripping it down like that leaves a lot of code space unused. I guess the
unused codes should be rejected as I currently do for the default mode.
Maybe I'll include 'extra code space available' in the error message ;-)
>I've sometimes thought there should be a function for splitting a long
>string into a bunch of shorter ones of specified length, but I don't
>know if that would give a worthwhile speedup vs. the obvious list
One might pass a chunk length integer to str.split, e.g.,
[s[i:i+n] for i in xrange(0,len(s),n)]
PS. Any other votes on base52?
BTW, this isn't a language thing, so I wouldn't think it's a PEP thing, but
what is the right way to proceed to get it considered for inclusion? A patch
for binascii.c is obvious. Are the following four the whole story? Is the html
automatically generated from the .tex?
The last two are just duplicates of the source distribution AFAICS.
More information about the Python-list