[ann] Minimal Python project
tismer at tismer.com
Sun Jan 12 22:18:05 CET 2003
Carl Banks wrote:
> Christian Tismer wrote:
>>Thanks, this is very encouraging.
>>Yes, the current C implementation is probably
>>near the best compromise between readability,
>>maintainability and efficiency ...
> You left out backwards compatibility.
Thank you, very true! I fogot to mention this.
>>... that can be
>>achieved with a static system.
With a dynamic system, you can have backwards
compatibility as well, together with the
flexibility to try alternatives on-the-fly
rather easily. Changing some very internal
things to try something out is still not
easy, but with welded C code, this is
Thanks for pointing this good argument out!
ciao - chris
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list