Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Thu Jan 9 02:20:07 CET 2003
Paul Rubin wrote:
> I'd vote for getting rid of the fancy stuff with the integer codes,
> and also making the odd-character the last character in the encoded
> string rather than the first. The reason is that lets you encode a
> stream where you don't know the length in advance.
Agreed on all counts. It should stay at the simple binary -> base52
encoding and, obviously, the reverse operation.
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ Strange is our situation here upon earth.
\__/ Albert Einstein
ZOE / http://www.alcyone.com/pyos/zoe/
A simple Python OpenGL rendering engine.
More information about the Python-list