Comments on base52 encoder/decoder ?

Erik Max Francis max at
Thu Jan 9 02:20:07 CET 2003

Paul Rubin wrote:

> I'd vote for getting rid of the fancy stuff with the integer codes,
> and also making the odd-character the last character in the encoded
> string rather than the first.  The reason is that lets you encode a
> stream where you don't know the length in advance.

Agreed on all counts.  It should stay at the simple binary -> base52
encoding and, obviously, the reverse operation.

 Erik Max Francis / max at /
 __ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/  \ Strange is our situation here upon earth.
\__/ Albert Einstein
    ZOE /
 A simple Python OpenGL rendering engine.

More information about the Python-list mailing list